bugtraq - CVE-2012-3546 Apache Tomcat Bypass of security constraints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50BE5367.6090809@apache.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 19:47:51 +0000
From: Mark Thomas <markt@...che.org>
To: Tomcat Users List <users@...cat.apache.org>
CC: Tomcat Announce List <announce@...cat.apache.org>, announce@...che.org,
  Tomcat Developers List <dev@...cat.apache.org>, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com,
  full-disclosure@...ts.grok.org.uk
Subject: CVE-2012-3546 Apache Tomcat Bypass of security constraints

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

CVE-2012-3546 Apache Tomcat Bypass of security constraints

Severity: Important

Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation

Versions Affected:
- - Tomcat 7.0.0 to 7.0.29
- - Tomcat 6.0.0 to 6.0.35
Earlier unsupported versions may also be affected

Description:
When using FORM authentication it was possible to bypass the security
constraint checks in the FORM authenticator by appending
"/j_security_check" to the end of the URL if some other component (such
as the Single-Sign-On valve) had called request.setUserPrincipal()
before the call to FormAuthenticator#authenticate().

Mitigation:
Users of affected versions should apply one of the following mitigations:
- - Tomcat 7.0.x users should upgrade to 7.0.30 or later
- - Tomcat 6.0.x users should upgrade to 6.0.36 or later

Credit:
This issue was identified by The Tomcat security team

References:
http://tomcat.apache.org/security.html
http://tomcat.apache.org/security-7.html
http://tomcat.apache.org/security-6.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQvlNnAAoJEBDAHFovYFnnsJoP/i6/NEKy6+tAcMZ0vKV5CGci
2Epf7NbfWHZhyYZlI445kHoCGQAvMaD0pXlLBUTlzVd2N9Jugk1j2WNPzvOlsaZ0
jx3qeuvNhVZzAa2LIDVSj8ENVNYMiA/S4reZu2u9lHqw5tTP5fapJXDNphSnr0kR
A662JdkQlirQtFylkvqFdMoZ3N/vEPwzD8Cs80fafEhEqcoOtrO6yOyaR/kwEFeI
5cxbm/om4+T9cVkRduGqhzLRBWnDiCeBguXiUJXDQorOWmzHq438cNd4ylfFRa1W
RBsin8aVY6LMIUqdWWqUnG8SPI7qp7odMRzhI1yLw+y4ykrV5coKeTvalIsh+3ZE
FWP7kYmrOYS8NToq56Fxn8bYAuAsJiOsVZ4ox0ozR9HQCEqLEpXTa31hEowUBtig
LO0HRgQIeh4rdgxxR2V46JiRw8URNfGevKrhez5B8UAb8hj02SM/3hyg3S3pL2Jn
fl0vLnf1+DACd0mUuGmSQNLx5VznW6fkYHZWgmV3SigaroKL4+BbqCO7WvuNs9aA
Y8dYt08IgF0O/Kt1vQdks31KEDIqHJOtrZBCySdvVLGz1x+MxluWssZGQELCcj0v
ByfH80yh/uIU2Zk9QTaJlEkuODyWTYxmYRk34R3/zZ57za+NQLlpe0cfBRy33wjt
VCfhXK6n3npDlmhpeBDw
=pOlX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----