lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <A941A6F4-3A51-4F01-BD09-1E69F2F3CB12@guru.at> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 19:03:33 +0200 From: Christoph Gruber <list@...u.at> To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com Subject: Re: [FD] Mozilla extensions: a security nightmare Reindl Harald <h.reindl@...lounge.net> wrote: > > that's all fine but > > * nothing new, independent of lightning ACK > * how do you imagine a restricted user install a extension otherwise Real sandboxing, if not possible, give the users the possibility to activate admin-installed extension, and not the possibility to install every shit which comes with a "I am free" or "I am sexy" tag. > * and no - he must not do that is not a acceptable solution Yes it is. > security and usability are always a tradeoff Not always, and if, sometimes security has to win. > hence the topic *is* nonsense No, it is not Just my 4 cent -- Christoph Gruber
Powered by blists - more mailing lists