[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207151610430.11231-100000@shishi.roaringpenguin.com>
From: dfs at roaringpenguin.com (David F. Skoll)
Subject: Counseling not to use Windows (was Re: Anonymous
surfing my ass\!)
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Roland Postle wrote:
> I should mention that I'm only referring to Windows NT here, Windows 9x /is/
> one monumental design flaw and not even worth talking about.
> It's hardly a 'fundamental design flaw' if it can be configured differently.
Well, OK. But let's say you tighten up security on NT. Then you
discover that all kinds of third-party (and Microsoft, for that
matter) software doesn't work any more.
> Many default unix installations will leave all a user's newly created files
> with world read access.
That's true. World-read access is slightly less of a problem than
world-execute access. And some Linux distros (e.g. Mandrake) offer
"security levels" which (among other things) let you change the default
umask to 077.
> And I bet the vast majority of novice computer users
> (the ones most at risk) would find it easier to change their file
> permissions on a Windows machine than a unix machine.
Well, the vast majority of novice computer users aren't using UNIX
(unless you count Mac OS X).
> The fact that 99% of Windows users are clueless is no reflection on Windows'
> actual security.
But Microsoft touts "ease of use" which lulls people into believing that
you don't need as much skill to use or secure Windows as UNIX. And that's
irresponsible.
--
David.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists