[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1027086957.1175.1.camel@ricalo>
From: security at ricalo.com (Georg Reitschmidt)
Subject: List charter
hm why signing a message with gpg when not publishing the key....
Am Fre, 2002-07-19 um 07.52 schrieb Len Rose:
> Hi..
>
> This is as close to an official statement as I can get.
>
> We will not make commercial use of this list, or
> from the contents of this list. We will not promote our
> services, or misuse this list to further ourselves or
> any other entity.
>
> We will all profit by the knowledge, and intelligence we
> gather to be used in our research, our jobs, and on our systems
> and networks.
>
> We don't want to repeat the same mistakes, and hopefully with
> everyone's help, we won't.
>
>
> Raju Mathur wrote:
>
> > Maybe this is the right time for bringing this up.
> >
> > Would the list admins kindly take the time to clarify their position on
> > the potential of this list going commercial at any time? A simple
> > statement like `the archives of this list, subscription to the list
> > and posting privileges to the list shall always remain free for
> > everyone' would do. Preferably PGP-signed.
> >
> > After CDDB, MAPS and ARIS I'm more than a bit concerned about
> > commercialisation of databases created by volunteer contributions.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > - -- Raju
> > - --
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists