full-disclosure

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

From: dotslash at snosoft.com (KF)
Subject: On sf sell out

Thats exactly why I love the reply-to on this list. =]
-KF

----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles 'core' Stevenson" <core@...eoa.com>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2002 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] On sf sell out


> Er... please disregard that last e-mail it was sent to the list on
> accident. If you're interested in joining our small list and develop
> exploits feel free to contact core-owner@...ps.english.org since I spilt
> the beans.
>
> best regards,
> core
>
> Charles 'core' Stevenson wrote:
> > Georgi,
> >
> > Hi I've always admired your work :) Especially the AIX shellcode..
> > anyways I just thought I would write you to inform you of a small time
> > for exploit developers only mailing list. So far we have about 10 well
> > reputed exploit developers on our list. And that's it! No security
> > consultants, pen-testers, script kiddies... the URL is here. excuse the
> > pop-up; I've found friendly hosting for the list but not the page yet :)
> >
> > http://www.crosswinds.net/~zerodaydigest/
> >
> > Please take a look at the charter. Anyways, we'd all love to benefit
> > from your wide range of exploit development expertise!
> >
> > best regards,
> > core
> >
> > Georgi Guninski wrote:
> >
> >> Here are my 2 stotinki on Securityfocus's sell out.
> >>
> >> I don't mind aleph1 & co. taking $75M. What I am concerned what price
we
> >> shall pay for it. ($75M is too much for collecting other people's
0days,
> >> IMHO)
> >>
> >> What scares me about Securityfocus is that since the beginning 2002
> >> they started not posting some of my posts to bugtraq but seem to post
> >> "politically correct" messages.
> >>
> >> They went so far to not post a real vulnerability  [1](later
> >> indirectly confirmed by Microsoft in a bulletin, not fixed yet).
> >> Then I decided - no 0days for securityfocus and started posting only
> >> comments and opinions, mainly on the topic of full disclosure.
> >> Most of them didn't get to the list, though the opposite of my
> >> opinions were
> >> posted.
> >>
> >> Hope they don't turn into mainstream media outlet and use the power of
> >> moderation for labelling people and ideas as good and bad in their user
> >> base.
> >>
> >> Note: I don't mean to whine for them moderating me down, it is their
> >> right
> >> to do whatever they want with their mailing lists, but think this
> >> should be
> >> publicly known.
> >>
> >> [1] http://www.guninski.com/signedactivex.html (also check ver. 2.0)
> >>
> >> Georgi Guninski
> >> http://www.guninski.com
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> >> Full-Disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> >> http://lists.netsys.com/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Full-Disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> > http://lists.netsys.com/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Full-Disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> http://lists.netsys.com/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure
>

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives