lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0207312357260.313-100000@abacus.xcorps.net> From: jonathan at xcorps.net (Jonathan Rickman) Subject: it's all about timing On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Eric N. Valor wrote: > Are we enough of an ad-hoc "authority" to attempt to determine a proper > course of action for these instances? Codifying this (even if it's just a > "gentlemen's agreement") would most definitely be A Good Thing. RFPolicy always seemed reasonable to me. -- Jonathan Rickman X Corps Security http://www.xcorps.net