[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200208011657.g71GvbC24569@lart.sdsc.edu>
From: tep at SDSC.EDU (Tom Perrine)
Subject: Re: it's all about timing
>>>>> On Thu, 01 Aug 2002 16:03:33 +0300, Georgi Guninski <guninski@...inski.com> said:
GG> What scares me is that the "Responsible Disclosure" FUD continues.
GG> On bugtraq people write that CERT and SecurtyFocus are "established parties" and
GG> everyone who does not give them their 0days is irresponsible (at least CERT is
GG> known to sell 0days). I personally won't give them my 0days early.
I would like to see evidence that CERT "sells 0days". Pretty
significant claim. Although, I probably wouldn't disclose the actual
exploits to CERT, just to the vendor.
GG> The "Responsible Disclosure" draft continues to get advertised, though it was
GG> not approved by IETF.
This is the problem. IETF had a chance to put a stake in the ground,
and didn't.
--
Tom E. Perrine <tep@...C.EDU> | San Diego Supercomputer Center
http://www.sdsc.edu/~tep/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists