full-disclosure - Re: it's all about timing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3D4A80AD.8020403@guninski.com>
From: guninski at guninski.com (Georgi Guninski)
Subject: Re: it's all about timing

Steven M. Christey wrote:
> 
> A number of people thought that the disclosure process draft placed
> too much of an emphasis on using third parties.  That will be weakened
> to a suggestion in the next version.
> 
>

I disagree with 3.6.2 Reporter Responsibilities from the draft.
My concerns are at: http://www.guninski.com/rfcsec.html

I believe a lot of people won't like some RFC to forcefully put responsibilities 
on them.

Who benefits from keeping reporters quiet for as long as possible - only big 
corps who can't code in my opinion.

A recent study showed that a lot of professionals want information about 
vulnerabilities as soon as possible.

Georgi Guninski
http://www.guninski.com