lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
From: coley at linus.mitre.org (Steven M. Christey)
Subject: Re: Clarification on Xitami DoS

I said:

> This thread is a good demonstration for why vendors need to be
> responsive to incoming vulnerability reports... Greater overall
> responsiveness by vendors is covered heavily by section 3 of the
> Responsible Vulnerability Disclosure Process draft

Georgi Guninski said:

>In my opinion bundling bad stuff and good stuff in one document does
>not make the whole document good.

I hope that we can restructure the next version of the document so
that recommendations for vendor responsiveness are somewhat separate
from the proposed disclosure process.  That way, vulnerability
researchers/notifiers could point to particular parts of the
disclosure document to give them some "backup," even if they do not
agree with other parts of the document.

- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists