full-disclosure - Re: anonymous doesn't want to be rm-d by Phrack High Council

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <382BC0C28F397F4785E7414B8279F5271B5356@n2-atl-exch.it.n2bb.com>
From: ARouse at n2bb.com (Alan Rouse)
Subject: Re: anonymous doesn't want to be rm-d by Phrack High Council

Maybe this is a deliberate DoS attempt against the list.  After all, we
know there are folks who don't want their favorite exploits to be
patched...  

I don't know if anything can be done to stop this without destroying the
intent of the list, but it would help if the rest of us would refrain
from responding to the drivel.  Yes, that means me too.  This is my last
post on the subject...

-----Original Message-----
From: Hardy, Nigel [mailto:nigel.hardy@...eopleserve.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 5:36 AM
To: 'full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com'
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Re: anonymous doesn't want to be rm-d by
Phrack High Council

I must agree here, only signed up for the list yesterday and out of the
30
odd mails i have received, only a half dozen or so were of any technical
use. The rest were moans about html mail, apolgies for someone sending
mail
from someone elses machine (how many apologies??) and general shouts.
Can we stick to the topics covered by the list and not just use this
like
#scriptkiddies ?
I have tried to keep this short and not put too much strain on your
already
overflowing inboxes
cheers for listening, this was a public service announcement !