full-disclosure - Re: anonymous doesn't want to be rm-d by Ph rack High Council

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: benfell at greybeard95a.com (David Benfell)
Subject: Re: anonymous doesn't want to be rm-d by Ph rack High Council

On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 15:02:00 +0200, Raymond Morsman wrote:
> 
> No, security through obscurity is BAD.

Security through obscurity is no security at all.  But I'm preaching
to the choir.
> 
> > its sad.  pretty damn fucking sad.
> 
> Yes, your overwhelming lack of knowledge you seem to need to compensate
> by blabbing a lot is sad. First good remark (you were even wrong on Gina
> Davis, must have been quite some time you've actually seen a woman).
> 
Apparently, that's Geena Davis.  Why are we even talking about this
here?

This is a thread which has no purpose other than the gratification of
children.  Oh, and that of supplying more e-mail addresses for my
black list.  Why are we continuing it?

-- 
David Benfell, LCP
benfell@...ts-unknown.org
---
Resume available at http://www.parts-unknown.org/resume.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 481 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20020814/5776ce0f/attachment.bin