[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1029428813.6582.18.camel@localhost.localdomain>
From: dave at immunitysec.com (Dave Aitel)
Subject: please stop this nonsense
One unmoderated list that allows many people to create their own
moderated versions is a good way to filter out spam, while not allowing
Symantec, or any one company, to control the distribution of
information.
For example, if you subscribe to "full-disclosure@...unitysec.com" you
can get my personally moderated version of this list, along with my
personally moderated archives, but you still send messages to the fully
unmoderated full-disclosure list.
That way anyone can offer a filtered version, but the truth always gets
out.
-dave
On Thu, 2002-08-15 at 08:46, Azerail wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2002, Marco van Berkum wrote:
>
> > so, moderate this list PLEASE.
>
> Just ignore them, I would rather have at least *one* unmoderated
> security mailing list.
>
> Azerail
>
> --
> A jury consists of twelve persons chosen to decide who has the better lawyer.
> -- Robert Frost
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20020815/cfaf9956/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists