lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <3D659236.4000904@atnet.net.au> From: johnpf at atnet.net.au (John) Subject: hypo-crazy ;) No Sockz, not a 'petty attack'. I'm quite willing to go into my reasons off list, as I'm not going to breach a legal agreement I made in a public mailing list. Feel free to mail me - I may well have a perspective (based on _experience_ of the whole blackhat/whitehat hacker/cracker vendor/police thingy) that may (hopefully) show you some issues that (based on your ideological rants so far) I believe you are unfamiliar with. WJS aka Immn sockz loves you wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: John <johnpf@...et.net.au> >Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 16:34:53 +1000 >To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com >Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] hypo-crazy ;) > > > >>OK, I've tried to stay out of this discussion but enough is enough. >> >> > >hail, Immn!!! > > > >>In Australia at least there hasn't been a culture if "girls cant do >>science" for a _very_ long time. In particular there is a very strong >>domination of biochem and genetic research by females, particularly >>those in the 50+ years old category. >> >> > >ooh okay so i'm wrong? fair enuff. like i said, i dont profess to know >everything about chemistry, i was just going off what i had heard from a +50yo >woman in the field. how 30 odd years ago women were free to study chemistry, >yet found it hard to get jobs because they were women. that was her account. >not that this has anything to do with the plight of female hackers, but wth eh. > >in any case thankyou for pointing this out, i'll make a note to look into it >some more when i get the chance. > > > >>Now if you'd said mechanical engineering I'd have agreed with you, as it >>is still a male dominated discipline. But certainly not Chemistry. >> >>As an Australian I'd of thought you'd have known better, especially >>being a student at a University with fairly strong Chem and BioScience >>schools - or perhaps you are not as 'in touch' with trends and gender >>issues in Oz as you think. Perhaps if you spent more time actually >>working on your course and not hanging in #phrack you'd have known that. >> >> > >uh huh. and your reason for coming up with a personal attack like that is >what? are you trying to say you dont really have a point at all? dude, i'm a >politics/sociology/info systems/IB student. science is about the only thing >i'm NOT studying right now. i ask for forgiveness if that makes me less than >perfect. > >if you want to go into gender discourses, then feel free. but petty attacks >like this only serve to highlight the fact that you have nothing else to say. >and as for spending most of my time in #phrack? please. i could say the same >about you and everquest and it would still get neither of us anywhere in this >discussion. :\ > > > >>And best of luck in your exams sockz... >> >> > >thanks, immn :) > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists