[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <NMRC.666.6.66.0208241711250.16826-100000@www.nmrc.org>
From: hellnbak at nmrc.org (hellNbak)
Subject: Re: HP Full Disclosure Story
On Sat, 24 Aug 2002, Georgi Guninski wrote:
> Just take a look at real world.
> When you buy a beer or a car and then find a bug in it, you may disclose
> the bug as you wish. (As bonus, both beer and cars come with warranties,
> unlike warez).
>
> So what makes beer and cars so different than warez?
If I purchase a car and find that it has multiple problems, I am by law
allowed to turn it back into the dealer and get either my money back or a
new car. If the dealer refuses, I call my lawyer and sue them.
SO WHY CAN'T WE SUE SOFTWARE VENDORS?!?!?!?
But, lets say I buy a car and it only has one problem, lets say that the
problem is major enough that it is going to take 10 days to be fixed, do I
call my lawyer and sue? Or course not, I leave my car with the dealer and
patiently wait for him to fix it.
What I am trying to get at here is while I think we should be able to sue
software vendors we also hold the responsibility to inform the vendor of a
problem and see to it that the problem gets fixed. If the vendor says
they need 10 days -- give them 10 days. If after 10 days they haven't
done anything -- disclose (call the lawyers..). To me its real simple.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
"I don't intend to offend, I offend with my intent"
hellNbak@...c.org
http://www.nmrc.org/~hellnbak
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Powered by blists - more mailing lists