lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <NMRC.666.6.66.0208251522550.21915-100000@www.nmrc.org> From: hellnbak at nmrc.org (hellNbak) Subject: David Ahmad (securityfocus/symantec) exposed Is there any real proof of this or is it nothing but a bunch of misinformation directed at the big bad evil corporation? Seriously, where is the proof? On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Defender Defender wrote: > Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 16:23:58 +0000 > From: Defender Defender <defender242@...mail.com> > Reply-To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com > To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] David Ahmad (securityfocus/symantec) > exposed > > > > >I was part of several hacker and cracker groups before entering the > >white-hat side. So what? > > > > So it depends much on what you do. You could have the belief that some > people are worth being hacked, and some others secure, of course. > > But if you were moderator of bugtraq, a "full-disclosure" mailing list, it > would obviously just be another proof that all you want is more hacked > boxes, and more work and $$$. > > That would be a total lack of integrity. > > _________________________________________________________________ > Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > http://www.hotmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- "I don't intend to offend, I offend with my intent" hellNbak@...c.org http://www.nmrc.org/~hellnbak -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Powered by blists - more mailing lists