lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <000801c24c89$912421d0$6701a8c0@fujilap> From: steve at entrenchtech.com (Steve) Subject: Of course you guys support full-disclosure > It is pretty easy to have an account on nmrc.org, to release > an anti-Microsoft "information anarchy" FAQ, yet to share an > account on the same machine as a Microsoft partner (Bindview > employee Simple Nomad), isn't it? Yet nobody doubts your > integrity in loathing Microsoft... Yeah, so? I worked for BindView at one point to. Last time I checked I had a mind of my own and being a part of NMRC doesn't mean that I have to conform to anyone's point of view other than my own. I speak for myself and myself alone. Funny Gobbles said the same thing about me once. Even more funny that you point your finger at me saying that I am making the wrong assumptions based on perceptions yet you do the same about me. > I know you're not that naive. After what they've done, why > would they loosely drop their real names? And should they, > what guarantee is there that you've even have heard of them? > Not all people are spotlight fuckers, so should the name "Joe > Blow" be dropped as an ~el8 member, it wouldn't satisfy you > anyway -- you'd consider the names fabricated. No, I wouldn't consider them fabricated. I am simply saying that if I am misinformed, please school me and show me the error of my ways. > The ~el8 members list is mentioned in each ezine release. > I don't see what your problem is. Fair enough. Then I will gladly admit that I was misinformed. Probably not the first time and probably not the last. I'm not perfect. > A lot of who? Who are you referring to? And based on what? > The zine content? Based on who I thought was a part of this whole thing. So I am misinformed and I really don't know their skill level although they have rooted some people whom one would think would know how to secure a box. Then again, I could probably just as easily end up on the owned list. > What part of "awaiting publication" eludes you? And I get the > distinct impression that such logs would be refuted by > someone like you as inconclusive, anyway. Actually no, I wouldn't say that they are inconclusive. I find the el8 txt files amusing -- that is until I end up on them that is. :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists