lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <200208261810.g7QIAfF41725@mailserver2.hushmail.com> From: rfp_the_ripper at hushmail.com (rfp_the_ripper@...hmail.com) Subject: Of course you guys support full-disclosure 1. Not all of us have personal mail accounts for domains registered by friends, companies, ... 2. Hushmail is free. There are many other free email providers, true, and I guess the only difference you'll acknowledge is the fact that hushmail is one of the providers that is kind enough to hide the originating IP. Unless you need people to prove they are not cowards, by tacking an IP into every SMTP header, I remind you that... * There are many "narcs" on this mailing list, no doubt * There are people on this list who believe anything appearing as text. * There are dipshits who express their opinion with DDOS attacks, and other niceties... (e.g. PHC losers) It's not ironic at all. Anonymity is security, and isn't that what this list is about? In case you're going to use the "hypocritical blackhat" argument, I remind you that I have not professed to be a blackhat on this list, nor am I one. My personal stance is that I feel any Internet security progress is best served in the non-profit academic community, and that anyone capitalizing on insecurity is a criminal who deserves all punishment they get from groups such as ~el8. I also feel that people working to increase security should not be calling themselves hackers, but this is the issue of a much longer debate. 3. Accountability. I think this is the one you're looking at. You want to be able to put a name or a face to every opinion expressed on the list. I don't blame you for this -- it's really annoying when you have some dickhead taking jabs while cowering behind some unknown alias. As I said in another post though, some people are totally invisible in the security world and hence there is no guarantee any such identity disclosure matters. Which leads to... 4. Credibility. It's a sad fact, but it's difficult to consider the views of those who have no stature in a particular field. Oh well. >This is kinda off topic, but does anyone else find it amusing t >he mass >amount of hushmail accounts being used on a full disclosure mai >ling list. > > > >-- >-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > >"I don't intend to offend, I offend with my intent" > >hellNbak@...c.org >http://www.nmrc.org/~hellnbak > >-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > >_______________________________________________ >Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > Get your free encrypted email at https://www.hushmail.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists