lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <91746143E3B6E9469DBBFF9228B5FDDC9741@srv2kw3exchng.entrenchtech.com> From: steve at entrenchtech.com (Steve Manzuik) Subject: Just a suggestion As someone who moderates a mailing list or two, I am curious. What is the issue with moderation? Why does a model where there are multiple moderators not work compared to this model? Please, no flames, I am seriously curious. -----Original Message----- From: Ka [mailto:ka@...dr.net] Sent: Wed 8/28/2002 9:30 AM To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com Cc: Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Just a suggestion -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 At Mittwoch, 28. August 2002 17:15 Schmehl, Paul L wrote: > Maybe we could get Jerry Springer to moderate this list? IMO the list is doing fine after the initial and then spuriously OT postings. Anyway better than to have it moderated. just my preference Ka - -- http://www.khidr.net/users/ka/pgpkey.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9bOyB72vu22ltWBERArEDAJ4xcWHcDyyOa0eDPJG/8/DtZNR4iQCfcPSQ oZ+aARx4nh06zuLBlaFINHA= =xhCi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists