[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20020906170312.00b36700@wells.cisco.com>
From: raceves at cisco.com (Richard Aceves)
Subject: Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco VPN
Client Multiple Vulnerabilities - Second Set
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dave,
The Advisory was signed using 0xF236759C which is valid from 12-June-2002
through 01-Jul-2005. I queried wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net, and the key was signed
by five members of my organization, another Cisco employee, a PSIRT member
who additionally participates in EuroCERT, a member of CERT/CC, and a
member of FIRST.
It's not clear to me why you see something different -- please let us know
if you have additional information that could help us understand the issue.
Regards,
richard.
At 14:28 09/06/02 +0100, Dave Wilson wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 08:00:00AM -0700, Cisco Systems Product Security
>Incident Response Team wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
><SNIP>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
><SNIP>
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
><MASSIVE SNIP - MEGA SIZED KEY ALERT>
> > -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
>
>
>So, I'm meant to verify this e-mail was sent by Cisco, with the attached
>key? Looking at wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net, I see no-one has signed your key
>either. Please RTFM. Have fun,
>
>Dave.
- --
Richard Aceves
Manager, Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT)
Cisco Systems, Inc.
+1 (408) 526-7035
http://www.cisco.com/go/psirt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.1
iQA/AwUBPXlFCvg/zCLC/3gNEQKu4QCgmK+nsxmxh1I/k+CgwlAL52BmLtEAn0WY
q+eHlAHmEJw0o1P2YThmpDq2
=L4Ij
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists