full-disclosure - RE: remote kernel exploits?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20020910204627.GD24716@madman.nectar.cc>
From: nectar at FreeBSD.org (Jacques A. Vidrine)
Subject: RE: remote kernel exploits?

On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 06:40:59PM +0300, Yonatan Bokovza wrote:
> It might be the case that this is the problem:
> http://www.openbsd.org/errata.html#scarg
> I know that a similar problem was fixed in FreeBSD a little
> later, but I can't find the correct pointer.

I believe the `similar problem' to which you refer is described here:
<URL:ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-02:38.signed-error.asc>

> Since this is a problem in the kernel, it might be remotely
> exploitable.

These are problems in the handling of arguments to certain system
calls.  So no, they are not remotely exploitable by themselves.

Cheers,
-- 
Jacques A. Vidrine <nectar@...abo.org>          http://www.celabo.org/
NTT/Verio SME          .     FreeBSD UNIX     .       Heimdal Kerberos
jvidrine@...io.net     .  nectar@...eBSD.org  .          nectar@....se