full-disclosure - Off Topic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <871080DEC5874D41B4E3AFC5C400611E02FE434B@UTDEVS02.campus.ad.utdallas.edu>
From: pauls at utdallas.edu (Schmehl, Paul L)
Subject: Off Topic

The very least you can do is have the balls to post this publicly,
Raymond.  I consider it dishonest to reply privately to a public remark.

Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu)
Department Coordinator
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raymond Morsman [mailto:raymond@....org] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 10:28 AM
> To: Schmehl, Paul L
> Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Off Topic
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 16:54, Schmehl, Paul L wrote:
> > Well, I tried to think of something cute to say in 
> response, but all I 
> > could come up with is, Fuck you Raymond.
>  > 
> > > BTW, I find it appalling how some Americans need to make a
> > > tearjerker out of this tragedy.
> 
> And why would that be. What's so wrong with this line that 
> you needed to respond in such a way?
> 
> Your response is full of hollow rethoric, that would make it 
> dishonest.