full-disclosure - Full disclosure?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209112016160.31771-100000@dent.suse.de>
From: draht at suse.de (Roman Drahtmueller)
Subject: Full disclosure?

>
> Let's see if this makes it through to the list.
>
> I can confirm that at least one post to the list has been deleted
> (mine), so, so much for full disclosure.  It was a nice thought while it
> lasted....

...not so fast.
There are many reasons why a posting didn't make it to the list.

Len Rose has been on the internet since the very beginning.
Both Len Rose and John Cartwright enjoy an excellent reputation with
respect to their commitment to privacy and security. I guess that it
would take a while to find people who apply the old-school ethical code
to their working style in the same way and who would be willing to run
such a list despite the sabotage in the first weeks.

You could have sent the message again if it didn't show up after 12 hours.
This message came through, like the other 12 messages did since the end of
July. It could as well be a problem on your own side.

> Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu)
[...]
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

Yes.

Roman.