[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <NMRC.666.6.66.0209162058350.26763-100000@www.nmrc.org>
From: hellnbak at nmrc.org (hellNbak)
Subject: openssl exploit code
On Mon, 16 Sep 2002, Charles Stevenson wrote:
> That's interesting as a bugtraq moderator approved a post of
> an exploit of mine without asking for consent. Namely
> RaQFuCK.sh. What's worse? I attempted to reply to the person who
> posted my exploit and discuss that I had only sent the exploit to
> full-disclosure but this little piece of information was conveniently
> withheld from bugtraq subscribers. Comments?
Well, consistancy would be a nice thing thats for sure. I can't speak for
Dave or for Bugtraq I can only speak for myself and to a lesser extend
VulnWatch. If the code is obviously copyrighted to someone else common
sense tell me that one should check before releasing it. Of course there
will always be ones that slip through but and effort should be made.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
"I don't intend to offend, I offend with my intent"
hellNbak@...c.org
http://www.nmrc.org/~hellnbak
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Powered by blists - more mailing lists