[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871080DEC5874D41B4E3AFC5C400611E032D118B@UTDEVS02.campus.ad.utdallas.edu>
From: pauls at utdallas.edu (Schmehl, Paul L)
Subject: The last word on the Linux Slapper worm
I think adding the text you proposed below would be appropriate. :-)
Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu)
Department Coordinator
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Laurie [mailto:ben@...roup.co.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 2:53 AM
> To: Schmehl, Paul L
> Cc: John.Airey@...b.org.uk; full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] The last word on the Linux Slapper worm
>
> As I've pointed out elsewhere, patching old versions without changing
> the version number is so stupid it leaves me boggling. But I guess in
> future I'll write into advisories: "warning - your vendor may
> be such a
> moron that you can't tell whether you are vulnerable or not by the
> version number, so I advise building from source or switching to a
> vendor with a clue".
Powered by blists - more mailing lists