lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: misha at cerber.no (Mikhail Iakovlev) Subject: THREATCON --> Re: scriptkids on this list Hello silvio, Seems to me like a good idea too, did you consider sending your suggestions to gcc team? Mik- Friday, September 27, 2002, 9:08:19 PM, you wrote: sbna> Aplogies Mik :) sbna> -- sbna> Does anyone think something like hints for compiler should be more sbna> standardized in specifications or os? sbna> I mean.. it wold be nice to have something like this in gcc standard sbna> includes and every other compiler (as optional implementation). sbna> #define NORETURN sbna> #if we are in gcc and its implemented sbna> #undef NORETURN sbna> #define NORETURN __attribute__((noreturn)) sbna> #endif sbna> and then go through things like all the usage functions in your system sbna> and change them to use it. sbna> if this were done across the free opensource os's, i'm sure alot of sbna> people could get involved into submitting patches, since it would be sbna> only trivial changes. sbna> for me.. i think noreturn is a good compiler hint. it makes for smaller sbna> code, and helps program analysis. almost every binary on your system sbna> does an exit in usage(), so these are good places to add this straight off sbna> the bat, with the entire system thus benefitting. sbna> I personally dont like the idea of adding attributes directly, since they sbna> are quite gcc specific. or even using the builtin's to be honest, sbna> but if they are macro's that can be changed easily, i say even the sbna> builtin branch prediction and almost everything else should become sbna> standardized as macro's, which are purely optional in implementation (but sbna> would be with gcc!). sbna> -- sbna> Silvio sbna> On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 07:59:41PM +0200, Mikhail Iakovlev wrote: >> Hello silvio, >> >> Friday, September 27, 2002, 7:48:45 PM, you wrote: >> >> sbna> THREATCON ADVISORY 1.21 --> "b4ck t0 th3 futur3" >> >> sbna> Be w4rned. this advisory requires 1.21 jiggyflopz of electricity to >> sbna> get you back to 1996. >> >> Silvio, please read my mail again. It doesn't concern you, and to be >> honest I am surprised that you replied :) >> >> I have no questions about your abilities at all. Never had any. >> >> Mik- >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html -- Best regards, Mikhail mailto:misha@...ber.no
Powered by blists - more mailing lists