[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3DA14C26.8040607@algroup.co.uk>
From: ben at algroup.co.uk (Ben Laurie)
Subject: zen-parse@....de is not zen-parse@....net
Florian Weimer wrote:
> zen-parse <zen-parse@....net> writes:
>
>
>>With regards to dealing with iDefense: It's an easier way for me to make
>>sure something is disclosed in an appropriate manner than me finding and
>>contacting all the people who need to be myself. And it gives me some
>>money, which, believe it or not, is useful to have occasionally.
>
>
> IMHO, the iDefense approach is highly questionable. But I won't argue
> with you in particular about it.
>
> However, it's highly surprising that the Apache developers call the
> iDefense approach "reasonable disclosure". Is it reasonable to
> disclose critical information on new security vulnerabilities to
> potential but paying blackhats *on* *the* *same* *day* *the* *vendors*
> *are* *notified*?
Umm. Nope. Guess there is a difference between iDefense and CERT after
all, then.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
Powered by blists - more mailing lists