lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
From: ben at algroup.co.uk (Ben Laurie)
Subject: zen-parse@....de is not zen-parse@....net

Florian Weimer wrote:
> zen-parse <zen-parse@....net> writes:
> 
> 
>>With regards to dealing with iDefense: It's an easier way for me to make
>>sure something is disclosed in an appropriate manner than me finding and
>>contacting all the people who need to be myself. And it gives me some
>>money, which, believe it or not, is useful to have occasionally. 
> 
> 
> IMHO, the iDefense approach is highly questionable.  But I won't argue
> with you in particular about it.
> 
> However, it's highly surprising that the Apache developers call the
> iDefense approach "reasonable disclosure".  Is it reasonable to
> disclose critical information on new security vulnerabilities to
> potential but paying blackhats *on* *the* *same* *day* *the* *vendors*
> *are* *notified*?

Umm. Nope. Guess there is a difference between iDefense and CERT after 
all, then.

Cheers,

Ben.

-- 
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html       http://www.thebunker.net/

"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff


Powered by blists - more mailing lists