full-disclosure - 60 Poot ze-a cheekee in de-a oofee!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0210111040430.11794-100000@stratigery>
From: eballen1 at qwest.net (Bruce Ediger)
Subject: 60 Poot ze-a cheekee in de-a oofee!

On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, David Vincent wrote:

> >Even an unmoderated list requires some filtering
> >of abusers.  Otherwise, what good is a list charter?
>
> my point exactly.

At first, I thought the "Poot" messages were just spam.  But the "GOBBLES"
identity possesses a certain amount of credibility.  Now, I believe that
GOBBLES is revealing the multi-platform root exploit in steganographic
fashion, spread out over many list articles.

I just can't find anything obvious - the Swedish Chef text part of each
"Poot" compares identically with every other one.  Perhaps the invalid
digital signatures contain the hidden bit(s).