full-disclosure - (no subject) PS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <871080DEC5874D41B4E3AFC5C400611E03EDDFE5@UTDEVS02.campus.ad.utdallas.edu>
From: pauls at utdallas.edu (Schmehl, Paul L)
Subject: (no subject) PS

I have to hand it to you.  Arguing that *withholding* information
*increases* freedom and doing it with a straight face is certainly bold.
:-)

Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu)
TCS Department Coordinator
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/


> -----Original Message-----
> From: anakata [mailto:anakata@...kata.hack.se] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:53 AM
> To: Boris Lorenz
> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] (no subject) PS
> 
>The problem with this line of reasoning is that this paranoid 
> response to the security risks isn't caused by the (few) 
> blackhats. It's caused and sustained by the security industry 
> - who obviously are the FUD-mongers - aided by the armies of 
> script kiddies - who are responsible for almost all damage 
> and intrusions - which their practice of full disclosure 
> creates. Thus, ending this practice will _increase_ freedom.