full-disclosure - Trustworthy Computing Mini-Poll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3E05B026.9090007@guninski.com>
From: guninski at guninski.com (Georgi Guninski)
Subject: Trustworthy Computing Mini-Poll

Simon Richter wrote:

> >What
> >features will my new computer have, that will convince me to lose certain
> >options I have right now - playing music, copying what I like, etc?.
>
>
> I'd say protection from binary viruses and stack overflows, plus if
> someone breaks into your computer and you have stored your key in a safe
> place you can tell what she modified. So this would be a definitve must
> if you're builing a server, and I'm asking now whether you would like
> those features on your home box as well, even if you had to give up DVD
> copying or get special illegal hardware for it.
>
"Illegal hardware"???
Is my customized linux "illegal software" under this nonsense?
The people proposing such nonsense should get real - there are quite a ways to 
modify processes execution, the simplest being a debugger.
Or are they proposing outlawing debuggers?
As in:
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
The Right to Read
by Richard Stallman

Georgi Guninski