full-disclosure - Trustworthy Computing Mini-Poll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <02122913172302.03432@bifrost>
From: thomas at northernsecurity.net (Thomas Sjögren)
Subject: Trustworthy Computing Mini-Poll

On Saturday 28 December 2002 13:51, yossarian wrote:

> I think i might run w/o Palladium - and search the net for cracked
> windows updates, they are availale now, so why should'nt they be in
> the future? I never thought it useful upgrading to a newer office
> since 2000, so why should I do so in the future?

Sure, that's always a option, until MS stops releasing non-Palladium 
patches (just like they planning to stop NT4 patches).

> Let's turn the question around a bit: if it is not backwards
> compatible, how am i going to upgrade a 150.000 usr network? 

Palladium isn't just software update like W2K -> XP, it's hardware 
upgrades as well. So if you want upgrade you're network your probably 
have to buy som new computers. 
And by the look of it all major hw-manufacturers are members of TCPA 
(and Palladium?) so in the Orwellian-future, you can't rely on cracked 
patches (does anyone _trust_ cracked patches btw?) to keep your network 
up and running.

/Thomas
-- 
thomas@...thernsecurity.net | www.northernsecurity.net  
thomas@...linux.org | www.se.linux.org