lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20030128195308.86251.qmail@web13115.mail.yahoo.com>
From: d4yj4y at yahoo.com (Day Jay)
Subject: [Secure Network Operations, Inc.] Full Disclosure != Exploit Release

Yo, you gotta just respect eeye or die. 
Know what I'm sayin', they don't lie.
A well written advisoriy can be shy, yo the exploit
is tight like chai. Fuck with eeye and you die. Don't
say script kid wrote it, you are making me cry.

You don't see it comin' you are already infected,
injected and soon they will be resurrected. In your
face, you suck whitehat dick with grace and must be
rejected. By people who will never repect you. So shut
up, sit down, take it like a man, they are about to
clown. Don't frown, brown is about to make his way
down to your gay ass town. Running around, they found
a way to make everyone's shit crash and go away.

This was already known, an exploit was already being
used, someone automated it using some advanced
shellcode shoes. Leaving you bruised, this looks like
a proof of concept virus for your ass, so stop
drinking boos.

Shit's unreleased haven't you heard the news, phychos
and biotches are soon to be amused. Shut the front
door, be quiet and wait to be analally used.

Just wait until someone makes a proof of concept
internet bringer downer and see what happens you hate
monger.

Don't be stupid and don't be a snitch, E to the
motherfuckin' Eye bitch!



--- Nicolas Villatte <Nicolas.Villatte@...alvas.be>
wrote:
> I am sorry but people who made this virus does not
> appear as script
> kiddies to me. Do you prefer to be aware of the
> exploit like the ones
> that will use it after some modifications or do you
> prefer only some
> "elite" is able to harm the systems?
> 
> Personally, I prefer to die seeing my enemy than
> being stabbed.
> 
> 
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] De
> la part de Strategic
> Reconnaissance Team
> Envoyé : lundi 27 janvier 2003 3:19
> À : full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Objet : [Full-Disclosure] [Secure Network
> Operations, Inc.] Full
> Disclosure != Exploit Release
> 
> All, 
> 
> I have been following the subject of full disclosure
> for a while, and as
> most of you know, have dealt with some of the issues
> that full
> disclosure can cause (HP/Secure Network
> Operations/DMCA).  While the
> idea of full disclosure is a good idea, and while we
> support it, we feel
> that the exploit source code should not be released
> to everyone.
> 
> It is possible to prove a vulnerability exists by
> releasing well written
> advisories.  Because of this fact, proof of concept
> code (exploit
> source) is not a requirement for the education of
> the possibly
> vulnerable. Releasing non-malicious exploit code is
> also not an option
> as any local script bunny/kiddie can easily render
> it functional.
> 
> Proof of concept code is useful for legitimate
> contract based
> penetration tests. It is also useful for study as it
> demonstrates
> fundamental flaws computers today (not built in
> security). But again,
> proof of concept code is not for everyone.
> 
> I am interested in hearing the opinions of the
> people on this list. If
> you are for exploit source disclosure, I would like
> to hear arguments
> supported by facts, that explain why.  I am equally
> interested in
> reasons why not to disclose information. 
> 
> With that said, Secure Network Operations, Inc. will
> no longer be
> releasing functional proof of concept code. We may
> release sufficiently
> detailed advisories. 
> 
> 	
> -- 
> Sincerely, 
> 	Adriel T. Desautels
> 	Secure Network Operations, Inc. (SNOsoft)
> 	phone: (978) 263-3829  | http://www.snosoft.com
> 
>
--------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>
http://www.snosoft.com/documents/SNOsoft-corporate-outline.pdf
> 	BEDD 0FAD 4CE2 6399 551F  86F5 B036 A540 D47C EC101
> 	
> 	
> 

> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/x-pkcs7-signature
name=smime.p7s



__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ