full-disclosure - [Secure Network Operations, Inc.] Full Disclosure != Exploit Release

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <003c01c2c7ef$47446110$6601a8c0@rms2>
From: rms at computerbytesman.com (Richard M. Smith)
Subject: [Secure Network Operations, Inc.] Full Disclosure != Exploit Release

Web bugs and cookies are more in the realm of privacy problems and I
don't really see them as security issues.

Most of the security problems that I have worked on deal with ActiveX
controls that allow programs to be run and files to be written from Web
pages and HTML email messages.  Pretty much the same area that Georgi
works in.  

I first wrote about the security problems with ActiveX controls in the
April 1997 in an editorial for Visual Basic Programmer's Journal:

ActiveX Security is Everyone's Business 
http://www.fawcette.com/archives/premier/mgznarch/vbpj/1997/04apr97/opin
ion.pdf

A few weeks ago, I found yet another ActiveX control that came
pre-installed on my new Sony laptop that allows programs to be executed
with arguments from a JavaScript program running in a Web page.  I sent
the software vendor a copy of my 6 year article because it still makes
sense today.

Richard 

PS.  What's with the personal attacks?

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of
backed.up.by.2048.bit.encryption@...hmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:14 PM
To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] [Secure Network Operations, Inc.] Full
Disclosure != Exploit Release

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Probably because none of them were terrible important or interesting.
Didn't they all revolve around "web bugs" or "cookies" and
"supercookies" and the like? Essentially "stupid pet tricks"?

Hardly enough to give a script kiddy an erection?

Definitely not in the same league as Georgi Guninski's findings and
absolutely not in David Litchfield's.

- ----- Original Message -----
From: Richard M. Smith

>>> One problem with anyone making private exploits is that
 >>> they always seem to get leaked, no matter who it is.

I've written at least a dozen proof-of-concept examples for security
holes.  I've given these examples to vendors and shared them with
friends and other security researchers.  I'm not aware of any of them
being made public.  In addition, I serious doubt that any of the
examples are of much use to anyone except to the vendor who messed up in
the first place.

Vendors probably find the bulk of security holes and I seriously doubt
many of these problems have proof-of-concept code published for them.

OTOH we know that public proof-of-concept examples are going to get into
the wrong hands.

Richard
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Hush 2.2 (Java)
Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify

wnUEARECADUFAj44UZcuHGJhY2tlZC51cC5ieS4yMDQ4LmJpdC5lbmNyeXB0aW9uQGh1
c2htYWlsLmNvbQAKCRDEHQGvBp4eRHrmAJkB+xIhEUWPfNXVbYEqAQNBHgA1dQCfRKdh
tkxti9byVRWQemicBGq8X+c=
=VHyZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Concerned about your privacy? Follow this link to get
FREE encrypted email: https://www.hushmail.com/?l=2 

Big $$$ to be made with the HushMail Affiliate Program: 
https://www.hushmail.com/about.php?subloc=affiliate&l=427
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html