Message-ID: <20030130143708.27235.qmail@email.com>
From: sockz at email.com (sockz loves you)
Subject: LAFFING MY SOCKZ OFF

----- Original Message -----
From: skyper <skyper@...fault.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 18:00:51 +0000
To: sockz loves you <sockz@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] LAFFING MY SOCKZ OFF

> Getting the magazine out has nothing to do with hacking. It's a matter
> of organizing things, blah blah blah. That's why we kickt any decent
> hacker from phrack staff and only kept those who have a talent for
> organizing, not for hacking. It would be wrong to waste their time
> with writing webpages, setting up servers, correcting email problems
> etc. Their talent is required for articles.

so all this shit about Phrack Magazine being "by hackers for hackers"
is a lie?  What you really mean is "by SQL weilding whitehats for the
clueless community".  perhaps this is why your magazine sucks so much
because your editors are morons and dont know how to select good
articles from shitty ones (not that i'm saying all articles were shit
just majority).

> I dont get the critic about HNN. HNN is now run by atstake.
> Same happened with www.l0pht.com. route got a job at atstake. If we
> would not have taken over the magazine you could probably read the articles
> on www.atstake.com/phrack. I'll listen to you if you dont agree
> to what we did in the past. You know my email.

*making a mental note to forward all email chain letters to skyper@...fault.net*
heh, you think i'm joking dont you :)

> To clear the thing up: I'm not the editor in chief. Im the webmaster (and

dude can you plz learn me SQL!  I was to design porn sites for mad ca$h y0!

> this is what you can read in the footers of the emails i sent form phrack.org).
> I'm taking care of the webpages - termporarily - until someone comes
> who is worth managing the magazine. 

wow.  thats absolutely amazing.  first you admit that your editors have NO SKILL
and here you say that even you yourself aren't worthy enough to manage the site.
or is this your way of saying "i'm sick of doing this shit for no money and
getting laffed at for it" hmm?
 
> If you know someone - be my guest.

i'd be delighted to take phrack.org off your hands.  i even have experience in
web design too!  you dont have to pay me, i can do this all for free.  let me
know when you're ready to transfer the domain into my name.  i will give you
shoutz in my html comments!!!

> skyper
> p.s. read ur text about the 'Hit Man'. Good. Check out 'ABC Warfare Defense:
> The Fundamentals of Atomic,Biological and Chemical Warfare Defense' by
> 'The Bureau of Navy personnel'. You may find some great parallels
> between that book and many hacking tutorials. You will like the
> 'Quiz' at the end of each chapter. Let me quote one question: "You are
> stuck in a contamined area for 12h after a surface nuclear blast. 4 of
> your 10 comrades are seriously _damaged_. How many will die until the
> end of the day?".

thx but i'm already familiar with atomic and biological weapons of mass
destruction.  in answering your question i am assuming that the distance
from the blast and the weight of the bomb are irrelevent since they are
not mentioned.  i am not certain what kind of theory the question asks
for.  if it refers to the linear theory of nuclear radiation then perhaps
only your 4 comrades will die and you will live :D  but on the other hand
you could all be suffering from radiation poisoning, your 4 comrades will
die first, maybe within 20mins maybe within 2 days.  you may live for 3
more years or 3 more weeks.  who really cares.  you shouldn't be playing
with nuclear weapons in the first place.
-- 
_______________________________________________
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

Powered by blists - more mailing lists