full-disclosure - Question about the new Xupiter toolbar

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <006a01c2c94d$e11f60f0$550ffea9@rms2>
From: rms at computerbytesman.com (Richard M. Smith)
Subject: Question about the new Xupiter toolbar

Nope, but we all already knew the answer. ;-) IE also doesn't remember a
"No" decision.  IE will just keep downloading the same ActiveX control
no matter how many times one says "No".  Turning off ActiveX downloading
is no solution either.  IE then just then popups with the silly warning
saying Web pages can't rendered properly.

Almost everything in the IE download scheme is designed to get people to
accept ActiveX controls for better or worse.  It's all very crappy
security policy but wonderful for the sleazy marketers.

Richard

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of Georgi
Guninski
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 11:24 AM
To: Thor Larholm
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Question about the new Xupiter toolbar

Thor Larholm wrote:
> There is no such thing as a "standard ActiveX drive-by download
mechanism",
> that term is utterly FUD.
> 

Has m$ fixed the "feature" of installing old buggy activex signed by
them?

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html