Message-ID: <000f01c2c948$54c74910$823fcaa3@libs>
From: gotcha at mymail.co.za (gotcha)
Subject: The worm author finally revealed!

i still think its MITNICK, lol...
----- Original Message -----
From: "sockz loves you" <sockz@...il.com>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 6:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] The worm author finally revealed!


> > I believe that the author of the worm is the infamous Kevin Mitnick.
> > The timing cannot be a coincidence. Mitnick was let loose on the
> > Internet on Jan 21 and four days later the Internet was brough down.
> > It's obvious that he is the one responsible.
> >
> > Solar
>
> Kevin Mitnick is not responsible for the SQL Worm, DORK.  That worm was
written
> by highly skilled hackers, the first version was released in October and
the
> second version two days after the worm hit.  The attack has its own
timeline
> that has nothing to do with Mitnick in the slightest.  Your suspicions are
based
> on coincidence alone.  GET A LIFE OUTSIDE OF HOLLYWOOD, MITNICK-WHORE.
>
> Fucking posers the lot of you!  Acting like you have a clue when really
you have
> NOTHING bar what bugtraq and wired tell you.  I LAUGH AT YOUR IGNORANCE:
h0h0h0h
>
> I think its amusing how all you clueless fucks have reacted to the attack.
"OMG
> A WORM IS KILLING THE INTERNET BLOCK PORT 1434!!!"  "BLAME MICROSOFT!"
>
> Idiots.  I pee on your mothers in their Sunday dresses and hope they catch
a
> nasty infection!
>
> Planned chaos strikes and you all panic and pretend like you know whats
going
> on when really you have no idea.  So you talk more, post more, panic more,
just
> so it seems like you're doing something of value, but really... you're
not.
> You're just adding to the bandwidth.  You are about as useful to security
as
> free 80s chiq-mullet porn where the girls are wearing those hideous
hawaiian
> shirts and look like they've been attacked by a make-up artist who's just
> escaped from a mental institution.  Those whores... are you.
>
> And what's the most we've seen come out of ISS.net?  "We found it first!
We
> named it before you did!"  Yet their response came at least a day after I
and
> others first noticed the attack.  Or it seemed that long at least.
X-Force must
> have been working overtime to have noticed the attack at all.  I think its
cute
> how the most substantial response from ISS to the worm was a flash
animation. It
> says Alert Con 3 on this animations opening page, but I saw it at 4.
X-Force
> panicked.  It was funny.  "OMG HOW DO WE CLOSE PORT 1434!?!"  Emergency
Response
> my ass.  And that animation sucked.  My 7yo cousin could have done better.
> SHAME ON YOU.
>
> But whether its called "Sapphire" or the "SQL Slammer"... all silly. The
smaller
> details are unimportant here.  Whatever, children.  Lets just review the
facts.
>
> SQL WORM:
> 25th July 2002 - Advisory and Patch Released
> 1st October 2002 - Exploit Released
> 25th January 2003 - SQL Worm attacks internet
>
> THERE IS A MESSAGE HERE, LOOK CLOSELY FOR THE PATTERN MY MORONIC READERS
>
> Dont you think its kind of ODD how exactly 6 months after the advisory and
patch
> were released that a worm should also be released?  Sounds kinda like
whoever
> did release this worm was laughing at the security in part.  That or maybe
they
> just wanted to give you all a chance to patch before showing you all up
for the
> lazy all-talk-no-patchin bugtraq bitchez that you are.
>
> I (and MANY others I know) certainly laughed lotz at how much the security
> industry had failed to measure up to its own standards.  Watching
whitehats
> panic about closing port 1434 was amusing given that days earlier they had
been
> reciting the same old "only lazy admins dont patch and they are the ones
that
> DESERVE to die" chants.  In my opinion, you all deserve death for what
you've
> done to computer security and the hacker scene.  And I hope you're loved
ones
> are too lazy to bury you and that your rotting corpse remains at your
computers
> logged into slashdot as a strong reminder to everyone just how deadly
full-
> disclosure mechanisms can be.
>
> YOU ARE ALL IDIOTS WHO CANNOT PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH
>
> And you all know that this is not the first time you whitehats have almost
> caused the destruction of the internet.  Oh yes, let's blame Microsoft for
> releasing buggy code in the first place... BULL SHIT.  Had your silly
full-
> disclosure shit worked THIS WORM WOULD NOT HAVE CAUSED NEARLY AS MUCH
> DEVASTATION.
>
> And you KNOW I speak the truth.
> And you KNOW that this is what the author of the worm was on about too.
>
> You had all better pray that your intelligence and understanding grows
fast,
> lest attacks like these grow in severity until you all realise the
correlation.
> That or you whitehats could just do us all a favour and DIE already.
Personally
> I'm all up for the death.  Less morons with computers breathing the air on
OUR
> planet, the better.
>
> I HATE YOU ALL
>
> <3 & p33z
> - sockz
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
> http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists