lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
From: hellnbak at nmrc.org (hellNbak) Subject: CERT, Full Disclosure, and Security By O How predictable. What are you 12? On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Georgi Guninski wrote: > Steven M. Christey proposed the responsible disclosure lame draft and signed it. > I find it quite hipocritical to propose delaying of information, and at the same > time mitre to get the 0days before they are released. So because Mitre proposes a "lame draft" you all of a sudden have a huge problem with them? Where in the draft did it say anything - or on Mitre's web site for that matter - that they collect zero days? I mean maybe I have to learn how to read better or pay more attention to Christey's talks but I have never heard of Mitre collecting code. AFAIK - they rely on outside information sources. That being said, even if they did collect zero days. how is that hypocritical? An example of hypocritical would be helping company find and bury security issues while spending all your time hacking their competing products....maybe thats not hypocritical and just unethical... -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- "I don't intend to offend, I offend with my intent" hellNbak@...c.org http://www.nmrc.org/~hellnbak -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Powered by blists - more mailing lists