full-disclosure - GROUP CONSIDERING SUIT AGAINST MICROSOFT OVER SLAMMER VIRUS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20030204030627.B25805@bednar.sk>
From: juraj at bednar.sk (Juraj Bednar)
Subject: GROUP CONSIDERING SUIT AGAINST MICROSOFT OVER SLAMMER VIRUS

hello,

> >While I'm on the subject, is any1 else annoyed with RH 8.0?
> 
> Annoyed by what?  I'm running Phoebe (the 8.091 beta version).
> 

he meant, that setting the liability precedent is quite important thing.
if someone sues microsoft over security flaw and wins (even in korea),
anyone can sue *insert your favourite os vendor name here* and win too. 

every software has bugs, making vendors liable is not a trivial thing.
making vendors liable for not providing security fixes in timely manner
is another thing (and maybe better).

it's interesting in any case...

     Juraj.