[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3E42D94B.6060904@thievco.com>
From: BlueBoar at thievco.com (Blue Boar)
Subject: SQL Slammer - lessons learned
Ron DuFresne wrote:
>>port 1434 on a client (so blocking replies)
> of course the client will reissue the request on aonther port and get the
> info required. No harm done.
Maybe for a completely different lookup call, it will. Meanwhile, the
blocked lookup comes back as no response, which will be interepreted as no
such name.
BB
Powered by blists - more mailing lists