[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <107A63CDD8FCD511BA9F0050BAB07BA82DEC16@NHEX1101>
From: arjen.de.landgraaf at cologic.co.nz (Arjen De Landgraaf)
Subject: [sean@...elan.com: Symantec detected Slamme
r worm "hours" before]
E-Secure-IT's first decision to put out a Red Alert on port 1434 was
on Saturday, January 25, 2003 10:19:12 PM New Zealand Daylight Time
This red alert was based on a number of conversations at the Nanog list.
We started to monitor the actual effect some three hours before on
our networks, around 19:00 New Zealand time
New Zealand is 12 hours ahead of GMT, so subtract some 18 hours for USA.
Arjen
E-Secure-IT
www.e-secure-it.us
-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Updegrove (security) [mailto:security@...egrove.net]
Sent: Friday, 14 February 2003 7:23 a.m.
To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] [sean@...elan.com: Symantec detected
Slammer worm "hours" before]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Len Rose" <len@...sys.com>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 9:48 AM
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] [sean@...elan.com: Symantec detected Slammer worm
"hours" before]
> Wow, Symantec is making an amazing claim. They were able to detect
> the slammer worm "hours" before. Did anyone receive early alerts from
> Symantec about the SQL slammer worm hours earlier?
The first I heard of SQ_Hell (The first name given it by Geoff Shively of
http://www.pivx.com) was dated Jan 25 2003 7:11AM here:
http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/308306/2003-01-24/2003-01-30/2
I don't use symantec products so I wouldn't have gotten any notice from
them. Someone else will have to verify that their notices went out before
Michael Bacarella's post.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists