full-disclosure - SCO, Intellectual Property and their [Tcpdump] advisories.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <001401c2e466$cd9fe340$1201a8c0@izone18>
From: silvio at big.net.au (Silvio Cesare)
Subject: SCO, Intellectual Property and their [Tcpdump] advisories.

I understand that SCO are going ahead with the suing various Linux vendors over IP issues(????).

Umm..  Can I ask why SCO did not credit me with the Tcpdump BGP advisory they released?  I find this an IP issue in itself, if
SCO take credit for my work; from reading the mails I sent to relevant mailing lists regarding the Tcpdump BGP bugs.

I posted to Vendor-sec mailing list and Tcpdump people well over 7(?) months ago..  I have saved copies of these emails if anyone is
interested.

OH.. I'm not the first person to see the BGP problems that the SCO advisory talks about..

The Tcpdump people fixed these and had some slight references to it on the Tcpdump mailing lists about 1.5(2?) years ago.. They
didn't tell any vendors though :(  My mails to vendor-sec and Tcpdump reference this also.

--
Silvio
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030307/3a8457e1/attachment.html