full-disclosure - Administrivia: Pressured to delete archive entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <000201c2ecd6$5f87b180$0201a8c0@fosi>
From: steve.wray at paradise.net.nz (Steve Wray)
Subject: Administrivia: Pressured to delete archive entry

Watch out for cruise missiles and CIA wet boys...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com 
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of Len Rose
> Sent: Tuesday, 18 March 2003 9:19 a.m.
> To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Administrivia: Pressured to delete 
> archive entry
> 
> 
> 
> We have come under some pressure to delete part of the 
> information from the message disclosing the Kerberos 4 
> vulnerability recently posted.
> 
> We would like to publicly announce our position in 
> regards to the material within the Full Disclosure 
> mailing list archives.
> 
> We strongly feel that:
> 
> 1. The archives reflect the entire mail traffic of the
>    list, which is composed of individual messages sent
>    by many different individuals. 
> 
> 2. The contents of these messages have become a matter 
>    of public record once they were distributed to both
>    those who are subscribed to the mailing list, and 
>    mirrored by various sites who also archive the mailing 
>    list.
> 
> 3. It would violate the editorial integrity of the 
>    archives and would also demonstrate a measure of
>    editorial control over the content of the archives 
>    that we are not prepared to exercise.
> 
> 4. That it is pointless to "delete a message" since
>    the message contents are already widely disseminated, 
>    cached, stored, and otherwise ingested worldwide.
> 
> To summarize, we are sorry that we cannot comply with
> any requests to delete the message in question, or any
> other for that matter.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>