[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <002a01c2fd43$3ed07440$e04f7780@ttol>
From: WChang at pickatime.com (Wayne Chang)
Subject: U.S. military helps fund Calgary hacker with $2.3 million
"Only one remote hole in the default install, in more than 7 years!"
I take it that it means there has been only one remote hole in the default
install a one 7-year stretch, whether that includes this year or not, it
doesn't say.
1990-1997 is a 7-year stretch.
1991-1998 is a 7-year stretch.
By default install, it means the default install of any openbsd in that
7-year stretch, not specific on one.
It's pretty tricky that the marketting strategists over there wrote up that
sentence, but if it sells one more license, then so be it.
Wayne Chang
Pacific Northwest Software
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pekka Savola" <pekkas@...core.fi>
To: "Blue Boar" <BlueBoar@...evco.com>
Cc: <guninski@...inski.com>; <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 3:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] U.S. military helps fund Calgary hacker with
$2.3 million
> On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Blue Boar wrote:
> > I'd be willing to give Theo the benefit of the doubt
> > that the author misunderstood the "Only one remote hole in the default
> > install, in more than 7 years!" claim of the OpenBSD team. Unless you
> > think that claim is also untrue.
>
> That claim is certainly untrue.
>
> If you take a default install from 7 years back, you certainly have more
> remote holes, in services that have since been removed from the default
> install -- looking 7 years back from *current* default install, not
> default install *7 years back*.
>
> --
> Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
> Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
> Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists