[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <96D569293EBFFF4E8C000686A0C05217F79931@ppoqwmsg1.quantum.com>
From: Matthew.Wagenknecht at Quantum.com (Matthew Wagenknecht)
Subject: Recommendations for a Passive Web Content M
onitoring solution?
Elron's WebInspector is a commercial product that can block, but it will run
in passive mode without blocking.. I think that what you are looking for.
You can request a 30 day fully functional demo. The reporting works very
well.. I used it for a spot audit on traffic use..
http://www.elronsoftware.com/productfamily/webinspector.shtml
..:: Matt ::..
Bother!, said Pooh as his network froze..
-----------
varified gramaticly correckt using EverRight Spellchecher v1.0
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Jacobsen [mailto:nick@...icsdesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 12:28 PM
To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Recommendations for a Passive Web Content
Monitoring solution?
Maybe I was not specific enough. When I said "Web Content Monitoring" I was
refering to monitoring the web site usage by employees during business
hours. I am not specifically looking for something that would trace it back
to the employee, just something to give my client a good overview of most
the surfing. I have seen the commercial solutions, such as silentrunner,
and websweeper, but those are targeted more toward stoping the viewing of
web sites, not just monitoring, plus, of course, they cost :) Also, as I
said in my origian post, I realize I could implement this myself, but again,
I would rather not re-invent the wheel.
Sorry if my original post was unclear
Nick
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Carp" <erc@...ox.com>
To: "KF" <dotslash@...soft.com>; "Nick Jacobsen" <nick@...icsdesign.com>
Cc: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 9:47 AM
Subject: RE: [Full-Disclosure] Recommendations for a Passive Web Content
Monitoring solution?
> Overkill. Why not use squid, which is included with every Linux
> system?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
> > [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com]On Behalf Of KF
> > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 5:12 AM
> > To: Nick Jacobsen
> > Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> > Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Recommendations for a Passive Web
> > Content Monitoring solution?
> >
> >
> > Snort?
> >
> > http://www.snort.org/cgi-bin/sigs-search.cgi?sid=porn
> >
> > -KF
> >
> >
> > Nick Jacobsen wrote:
> >
> > >Not sure that this is an exactly suitable topic, but anything
> > seems to go,
> > >so...
> > >
> > >I am trying to find an open source (read free) PASSIVE web content
> > >monitoring solution. We are looking for something that can be put
> > >on a network, and using promiscuous mode, capture and analyze web
> > traffic, etc...
> > >We would obviously place this in such a way that all network
> > traffic would
> > >pass by it. Any suggestions would be welcome, though again, I am
looking
> > >for something specifically designed to do this, as I know I could
modify
> > >existing tools myself...
> > >
> > >Nick
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > >Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists