full-disclosure - Recommendations for a Passive Web Content Monitoring solution?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <009601c2ff9f$1226c990$1500020a@bigdog>
From: listuser at seifried.org (Kurt Seifried)
Subject: Recommendations for a Passive Web Content Monitoring solution?

How is this related to full-disclosure? Please go to a vendor support list
or find "monitoring-users-list@".

============
Acceptable Content
Any information pertaining to vulnerabilities is acceptable, for instance
announcement and discussion thereof, exploit techniques and code, related
tools and papers, and other useful information.
Gratuitous advertisement, product placement, or self-promotion is forbidden.
Disagreements, flames, arguments, and off-topic discussion should be taken
off-list wherever possible.

Humour is acceptable in moderation, providing it is inoffensive. Politics
should be avoided at all costs.

Members are reminded that due to the open nature of the list, they should
use discretion in executing any tools or code distributed via this list.
===========

Get it? This is not appropriate content for the list. Shame on all for
replying to the list. And shame on me for having to post this.

Sometimes a little moderation isn't a bad thing.

Kurt