| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <928574116BD3784BBA6E7B0F017BA88A01451E25@SRVXCH10.LANPRD.NBB> From: Max.Rapaille at nbb.be (Rapaille Max) Subject: Recommendations for a Passive Web Content Monitoring solution? In the same way : Surfcontrol do it very nicely.. It is developped to block, but has a nice repoting-only feature, extensives log and reports + classification. Easy to install you can get a 30-day evluation.. Cheers MAx -----Original Message----- From: Jason Healy [mailto:jhealy+full-disclosure@...n.net] Sent: jeudi 10 avril 2003 21:41 To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Recommendations for a Passive Web Content Monitoring solution? At 1049992100s since epoch (04/10/03 14:28:20 -0400 UTC), Nick Jacobsen wrote: > I am not specifically looking for something that would trace it back > to the employee, just something to give my client a good overview of > most the surfing. Couldn't you just use a forced (e.g., transparent) HTTP proxy? I use Squid at home as a transparent proxy for all the machines on my network. It keeps logs of all the URLs accessed, and I imagine there are tools to analyze the log files (otherwise, 2 minutes' worth of perl would get the logs into a form that you could analyze). If you set it up for the network, you would be able to see all of the requests from the network. As a side bonus, you'd probably get better connectivity from the caching... =) Jason -- Jason Healy http://www.logn.net/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists