lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <000401c3075c$742c6cc0$6401a8c0@fujilatop> From: steve at entrenchtech.com (Steve Manzuik) Subject: RE: [ISN] DARPA pulls OpenBSD funding > Course "them" includes Micro$oft who claims that the use of the term "_NSAKEY" in all their OS's since W95/NT4 was "an > unfortunate use of words"... Just to play devil's advocate here -- has anyone proved MS wrong in this claim yet? If memory serves me correctly, they never said it was unfortunate wording -- but a "backup" key.