full-disclosure - pissed off

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1209.63.204.177.100.1051372551.squirrel@web.axisamerica.com>
From: badpack3t at security-protocols.com (badpack3t)
Subject: pissed off

Tamer,

You really are an idiot aren't you.

>To stress, the
> vulnerability that Badpack3t has found out is a different vulnerability.

and then you say:

>Currently the situation is that;
> Badpack3t has figured out that he published an advisory on the
> vulnerability that does not belong to him and I explained the truth.

I think you need to put that hooka down, and read a little closer.  You
dont own any rights to any vulnerabilities.  Is this some new law that you
just created or am I mistaken?  The vendor fixed the bug you found back in
2002.  You need to read the advisory a little closer before you start
sending our your little bullshit emails about copyright laws and whatnot.

I think you would be better off just dropping this because your making
yourself look like a real ass.

-badpack3t
www.security-protocols.com

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I could not understand why this argument keept on this much. I am
> so busy now a days. I could not find any time to write a response to the
> maillish back after i recieved the mail from Badpack3t. To stress, the
> vulnerability that Badpack3t has found out is a different vulnerability.
>
> However, the one that Secunia has found out, of which all rights
> belong to me, is not a acceptable case. Currently the situation is that;
> Badpack3t has figured out that he published an advisory on the
> vulnerability that does not belong to him and I explained the truth. he
> vulnerability the Badpack3t has found out is different one, however, the
> reaction that he act against secunia is wrong.
>
> I wanted to express this.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tamer Sahin
> http://www.securityoffice.net
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32)
>
> iD8DBQE+qow8gfeC/CdyvS8RAnwxAJ9XHjhI9Bia+IhWEvf5opzPTuWTVACffD4c
> m3WSr4PwEgpym5+t9blO8qc=
> =8T7K
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----