lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3EAFF163.7090901@snosoft.com>
From: dotslash at snosoft.com (KF)
Subject: Administrivia: Vacation Messages - Update

Nick FitzGerald wrote:

>So warning idiots of their grave lack of security clue is off-topic 
>for a "full disclosure" computer security mailing list?
>  
>
I certainly don't think that was the point... I believe it was the fact 
that it has happened quite often and that it is unneccessary to cc the 
entire list every time this happens. There is a big difference between 
warning someone of "lack of security clue" and notifying the entire 
list. The last few auto responders I have seen simply turned into a 
shark like feeding frenzy on the individual that turned the auto 
responder on... there has been no benefit to the list in the discussions 
that occur. I believe they are only trying to decrease the amount of 
noise on the list.

>Interesting...
>
>Will the next "improvement" be a Bugtraq-like "wait some random 
>period between 48 and 96 hours before forwarding messages for 
>moderation"??
>
again I think you are taking the intended message a little too far.

>Regards,
>
>Nick FitzGerald
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
>  
>



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ