full-disclosure - PGP vs. certificate from Verisign

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20030509150907.K4199-100000@lithagus.turtleshell.net>
From: salgatt at turtleshell.net (Scott M. Algatt)
Subject: PGP vs. certificate from Verisign

I am not sure if it will affect the Digital Certificates but when using
PKI and Outlook XP, you need to modify the below reg key :

HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\Security\UseCRLChasing

It is set at 1 you need to change it to 2.  If you don't change that,
Outlook will look like it dies and hangs for minutes when dealing with PKI
certificates.

Regards,

Scott M. Algatt

Behold the turtle. He makes progress only when he sticks his neck out.

On Fri, 9 May 2003, Kamal Habayeb wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> I'm trying to get some expert opinions on which is better.  Using Outlook
> 2002, would it be better to use PGP to encrypt messages or use the built-in
> option with a digital certificate from Verisign (or some other CA)?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kamal
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
>