[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20030509121441.GA2999@eiv.com>
From: smcmahon at eiv.com (Shawn McMahon)
Subject: SRT2003-05-08-1137 - ListProc mailing list ULISTPROC_UMASK overflow
On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 12:15:41PM -0500, KF said:
>
> not on hand to thoroughly test the fix. SecNetOps did not have the
> facilities to compile the new version of catmail in efforts to test the
> fix on our own. The problem appeared to be caused by a series of strcat()
Huh? They can't come up with a Linux box with enough HD space to store
the source code? What, does the company use PCs in their school library
to do all their Important Security Consultant Work?
Never mind, I just looked at their website. Maybe they truly DON'T have
any Linux or other UNIX boxes.
--
Shawn McMahon | Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill,
EIV Consulting | that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any
UNIX and Linux | hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure
http://www.eiv.com| the survival and the success of liberty. - JFK
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20030509/64b82ba6/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists